By Tony Okafor
The Anambra State Government’s approach to demolishing buildings allegedly used for kidnapping and other crimes warrants careful consideration.
While the intention behind this policy is understandable, its execution requires a more nuanced approach to avoid unintended consequences.
The recent demolition of a hotel where graves were discovered is a case in point.
Razing the building could have destroyed crucial evidence, potentially hindering the investigation and prosecution of suspects.
This raises concerns about the government’s methods and the potential for miscarriages of justice.
Demolishing buildings simply because they have been occupied by criminals can have far-reaching and unfair consequences.
In some areas in Ihiala, where hoodlums have taken over people’s houses for illicit activities, demolishing these buildings would unfairly punish the original owners or occupants.
This approach fails to distinguish between the criminals and the innocent, potentially leading to further displacement and suffering.
The law permitting demolition was enacted to combat crime. However, in a democratic setting, it is crucial to review and refine such laws to ensure they are fair, just, and respectful of human rights.
Alternative approaches, such as seizing properties linked to criminal activities or working with law enforcement to gather evidence and prosecute offenders, should be considered.
While the Anambra State Government’s efforts to combat crime are commendable, the demolition of alleged crime scenes requires a more thoughtful and balanced approach.
By reviewing and refining the existing law, the government can ensure that justice is served while protecting the rights and interests of innocent citizens.
